November 7, 2012
Charles Van, Sr. V. Daniel Schmidt
Case Number(s):
Loading the player...

This video requires Adobe Flash to be installed and activated on your browser to play. Because modern browsers are turning off the Flash feature, please verify in your browser settings that you have allowed You can find instructions for your browser online. Try these instructions for Chrome and these for Firefox.



Mr. Van and his wife sued Mr. Schmidt after an auto collision, which they alleged injured Mr. Van. At trial, Mr. Schmidt argued that Mr. Van's injuries were not caused by the collision. The jury agreed with Mr. Schmidt. The judge granted the Vans' motion for a new trial, agreeing the jury verdict was contrary to most of the evidence. On appeal, the First District Court of Appeal overturned that decision, finding the trial court abused its discretion. The Vans asked this Court to review the case.

Alachua County