Malu and Padilla filed separate suits claiming that the mileage reimbursement rate offered to them by their auto insurers was not reasonable. The trial courts held that the reimbursement amount was reasonable as a matter of law. The Third and Fourth District Courts affirmed the trial court orders on the basis that the statute does not provide for reimbursement of mileage expenses. This holding is in conflict with a 1986 decision from the Fifth District Court of Appeal.