The Fourth District Court of Appeals held that a prior conviction in which the defendant only received probation is not a "sentence" for purposes of applying the sequential sentence requirement of the habitual offender statue. This statute requires that the two felony offenses serving as the basis for "habitualization" be sentenced on prior and separate occasions. Other districts have disagreed and held that a defendant's habitual offender status can be based on a prior conviction for which only probation was received. These other districts have certified conflict with the Fourth District's decision in this case. The State appeals the Fourth District's decision and argues that the other districts' rulings should be followed.