Mr. Wyche was convicted of burglary of a structure, grand theft, and criminal mischief. At his trial, he tried to suppress DNA evidence, arguing police tricked him into agreeing to saliva swab by talking about other investigations. This, he argued, violated his constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure. The judge denied his motion and the 1st District Court of Appeal rejected his appeal. In his appeal to this Court, Mr. Wyche argues the ruling by the 1st DCA conflicts with a ruling by the 4th District Court of Appeal. The state argues that suspects are not coerced when they are misled by police about what is being investigated.