Mr. Baptiste was convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and sentenced to 15 years in prison. He argues that the State should not have been allowed to use the gun as evidence because the police were following up on an anonymous 911 call and did not have reasonable suspicion to stop and search him. The State argues that the officers did have reasonable suspicion to conduct the stop and search because the 911 caller approached the officers after Mr. Baptiste had been stopped and identified Mr. Baptiste as the person about whom he had called. The Third District Court of Appeal upheld the conviction and this review followed.